The effectiveness of transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders: the role of and impact of comorbid depression.

Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (tCBT), an intervention designed to be applicable across multiple diagnoses, was introduced to improve limitations in traditional therapy such as cost and access to trained therapists. It has been established as an effective and efficacious treatment for anxiety disorders, though there has been little research focussed on the role of depression. The current study investigated the role of comorbid depression during tCBT for anxiety disorders in primary care settings as an outcome and a moderator of anxiety outcomes. Results of multi-level ANOVAs indicated no significant difference in anxiety outcomes regardless of whether there was a comorbid depression diagnosis in the tCBT condition, and that individuals with a comorbid depression diagnosis experienced significantly greater reduction in anxiety severity than those without. Depression symptom severity decreased to a significantly greater extent in the tCBT condition than in TAU when the outcome measure of Patient Health Questionnaire was utilised as the outcome measure, but this was not mirrored when the Clinician Severity Rating was utilised as the outcome measure. This study provides preliminary support for the effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behaviour therapy for those with both a principal anxiety disorder and comorbid depression in symptom reduction.

Cost-Effectiveness of Group Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care Settings: Economic Evaluation From the Healthcare System Perspective Over a 1-Year Time Horizon.

AIM: To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of group transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioural therapy (tCBT) added to treatment as usual (TAU) for anxiety disorders compared to TAU only from the healthcare system perspective over a 1-year time horizon. METHODS: Data from a pragmatic multisite randomized controlled trial where adults (18-65 years) with an anxiety disorder were randomized to tCBT + TAU (n = 117) or TAU (n = 114). Group tCBT is a 12-week (2h weekly sessions) community-based intervention. Health service utilization and related costs were captured from medico-administrative data and included those for the intervention, ambulatory visits, hospitalizations and medications. Effectiveness was based on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The study included measures at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months. Intention-to-treat and complete case analyses were carried out. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation analyses. Seemingly unrelated regression analyses were used to assess the effect of the intervention on total costs and QALYs while also adjusting for baseline confounders. The probability of cost-effectiveness of the intervention was assessed according to different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds using the net benefit regression method. RESULTS: The ICER of tCBT + TAU as compared to TAU in the intention-to-treat analysis was $6,581/QALY. Complete case analyses showed a similar ICER of $6,642/QALY. The probability at a WTP threshold of $20,000 and $40,000 that tCBT + TAU as compared to TAU is cost-effective is 93.0% and 99.9%. CONCLUSION: tCBT added to TAU appears to be cost-effective from the healthcare system perspective for treating adult patients with anxiety disorders. Larger trials including young and older adults as well as a range of anxiety disorders are needed to further investigate the cost-effectiveness of tCBT in different patient populations.

Moderators of the cost-effectiveness of transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorders over an 8-month time horizon using a net-benefit regression framework.

BACKGROUND: Access to evidence-based psychological treatment is a concern in many parts of the globe due to government-level financial constraints and patient-level barriers. Transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy (tCBT) is an effective treatment approach that uses a single protocol for anxiety disorders which could enhance the dissemination of evidence-based psychotherapy. In a context of limited resources, the study of treatment moderators can allow to identify subgroups for which the cost-effectiveness of an intervention differs, information that could impact decision-making. So far, there has been no economic evaluation of tCBT for different subpopulations. The objectives of this study, using the net-benefit regression framework, were to explore clinical and sociodemographic factors as potential moderators of the cost-effectiveness of tCBT compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU). METHODS: This is a secondary data analysis of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial opposing tCBT added to TAU (n = 117) to TAU only (n = 114). Data on costs from the health system and the limited societal perspectives, as well as anxiety-free days, an effectiveness measure based on the Beck Anxiety Inventory, were collected over an 8-month time horizon and used to derive individual net-benefits. The net-benefit regression framework was used to assess moderators of the cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU as opposed to TAU alone. Variables of sociodemographic and clinical nature were assessed. RESULTS: Results showed that the number of comorbid anxiety disorders significantly moderated the cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU compared to TAU from the limited societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: The number of comorbid anxiety disorders was identified as a moderator affecting the cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU compared to TAU from the limited societal perspective. More research is needed to strengthen the case of tCBT from an economic standpoint for large-scale dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02811458, 23/06/2016.

An examination of sudden gain prevalence across cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depressive disorders: A quantitative analysis and meta-analytic review.

Sudden gains, incidences of unexpectedly large and stable session to session symptom reductions during psychotherapy, have been shown in samples of individuals receiving treatment for both anxiety and depressive disorders, although seemingly more frequently in sample receiving treatment for depressive disorders. This may suggest that sudden gains are a function of depression, but the high comorbidity between anxiety and depressive disorders makes this difficult to assess. Study One utilised a sample of 117 adults undergoing CBT for a principal anxiety disorder to explore the effect of comorbid depression on sudden gain prevalence. Results indicated that sudden gains were not more prevalent in the comorbid depression group; however, the frequency of sudden gains was significantly related to comorbid depressive disorder severity. Study Two involved a meta-analysis of 48 studies to compare sudden gain prevalence between trials of CBT for depressive disorders versus anxiety-related disorders. The results of the meta-analysis indicated significantly higher rates of sudden gains in samples with a principal depressive disorder diagnosis, compared to a principal anxiety disorder diagnosis. Sudden gains may therefore be driven by depression, but only at the more severe level.

An analysis of differential improvement by diagnosis in group transdiagnostic cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Anxiety disorders are the most prevalent among the mental health disorders and have a negative impact on an individual's life. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is documented as the most effective treatment for anxiety disorders. However, challenges associated with implementing diagnosis-specific CBT have led to transdiagnostic approaches of CBT (tCBT). tCBT uses a single protocol with core elements of CBT for treatment of anxiety disorders broadly. The aim of the current study is to examine whether participants with different principal anxiety diagnoses demonstrate similar anxiety reduction. METHODS: The current study involved a secondary analysis of 117 participants randomly allocated to receive tCBT for anxiety disorders in a pragmatic randomised effectiveness trial. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Clinician Severity Ratings (CSR) scales were administered at pre- and post-treatment and one-year follow-up, while the Anxiety Disorder Diagnostic Questionnaire - Weekly (ADDQ-W) was administered each session. RESULTS: Mixed-factorial analyses of variance (ANOVAs) indicated that participants with GAD, SAD and PD/A improved to post-treatment and maintained to follow-up, with no differential improvement across principal diagnoses. Mixed effect regression modelling of session by session measures indicated non-differential negative slopes across principal diagnoses of GAD, SAD and PD/A. CONCLUSION: Overall, results indicate that group tCBT for anxiety disorders shows equal effectiveness for GAD, PD/A, and SAD in real-world conditions.

Cost-effectiveness of transdiagnostic group cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders v. treatment as usual: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial over an 8-month time horizon using self-reported data.

BACKGROUND: This economic evaluation supplements a pragmatic randomized controlled trial conducted in community care settings, which showed superior improvement in the symptoms of adults with anxiety disorders who received 12 sessions of transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioural group therapy in addition to treatment as usual (tCBT + TAU) compared to TAU alone. METHODS: This study evaluates the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of tCBT + TAU over an 8-month time horizon. For the reference case, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) obtained using the EQ-5D-5L, and the health system perspective were chosen. Alternatively, anxiety-free days (AFDs), derived from the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the limited societal perspective were considered. Unadjusted incremental cost-effectiveness/utility ratios were calculated. Net-benefit regressions were done for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds range to build cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC). Sensitivity analyses were included. RESULTS: Compared to TAU (n = 114), tCBT + TAU (n = 117) generated additional QALYs, AFDs, and higher mental health care costs from the health system perspective. From the health system and the limited societal perspectives, at a WTP of Can$ 50 000/QALY, the CEACs showed that the probability of tCBT + TAU v. TAU being cost-effective was 97 and 89%. Promising cost-effectiveness results using AFDs are also presented. The participation of therapists from the public health sector could increase cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: From the limited societal and health system perspectives, this first economic evaluation of tCBT shows favourable cost-effectiveness results at a WTP threshold of Can$ 50 000/QALY. Future research is needed to replicate findings in longer follow-up studies and different health system contexts to better inform decision-makers for a full-scale implementation.

A Self-Help Manual for Psychological Distress and Quality of Life During a Haemopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant: An Effectiveness and Acceptability Pilot.

Haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) can be a highly distressing procedure that negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). Self-help interventions can help improve psychopathology and wellbeing in patients with physical illness, but have rarely been trialled with HSCT recipients. This study aimed to pilot the utility of a self-help manual intervention during the acute phase of HSCT. Forty autologous and allogeneic HSCT candidates were randomly assigned to a self-help manual intervention or treatment as usual (TAU). Psychological distress (BSI-18) and QoL (FACT-BMT-Vs4) were measured pre-, 2-3 weeks and 3 months post-HSCT. Linear mixed-effects analyses showed no significant group-time interaction for global QoL (p = .199) or global distress (p = .624). However, highlighting a protective role during admission, manual participants showed minimal QoL or somatic distress change at 2-3 weeks post-transplant compared with moderate-large effects for reduced QoL (d = 0.62) and increased somatic distress (d = - 0.81) for TAU patients. Thematic analysis suggests the manual helped prepare patients for transplant and provided strategies to improve distress and QoL. This pilot provides preliminary evidence for the benefit of a self-help manual during hospitalisation for a HSCT. More intensive, recovery-focussed care, however, may be needed to improve psychological health in the post-hospital period. Retrospectively registered trial (ANZCTR No. 12620001165976, 6th November 2020).

The Influence of Transdiagnostic Vulnerability Factors on PTSD Symptom Clusters in a Veteran Sample.

BACKGROUND: There is continuing debate as to the latent structure underpinning posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology. The transdiagnostic vulnerability factors of negative affect, anxiety sensitivity (and subcomponents) and intolerance of uncertainty have previously demonstrated the ability to explain symptom clusters in a range of anxiety and depressive disorders, and may give further understanding of PTSD symptomatology. METHOD: Within an Australian Defence Force veteran population, structural equation modeling is utilized to assess whether a hierarchical Original Model containing negative affect as the general cognitive factor, anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty as mid-level factors, can explain variability among posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. A further hierarchical Anxiety Sensitivity Extended model consisting of the general cognitive factor of negative affect and the three sub-factors of anxiety sensitivity as mid-level factors was also tested upon PTSD symptom clusters. RESULTS: Both the hierarchical Original and Anxiety Sensitivity Extended models fit the data well. Within both models, negative affect consistently showed significant direct effects upon the posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters. In the Original Model, anxiety sensitivity served as a significant mediator of negative affect for several symptom clusters, while intolerance of uncertainty was non-significant both as a direct effect and as a mediator of negative affect. In the Anxiety Sensitivity Extended Model, the cognitive concerns sub-factor of anxiety sensitivity served as a significant mediator of negative affect for several symptom clusters, while the social and physical concerns sub-factors did not have significant direct or mediating effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a transdiagnostic hierarchical model significantly explains the severity of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition posttraumatic stress disorder symptom constructs within a subclinical population. Negative affect and anxiety sensitivity can each be targeted with specific interventions, suggesting new avenues to augment current gold standard psychotherapeutic interventions.

A scoping review of psychosocial interventions to reduce internalised shame.

Internalised shame has been linked to psychopathology and consistently identified as a predictor of poor treatment outcomes and premature therapy termination. We conducted a scoping review of therapist-delivered psychosocial interventions to reduce internalised shame to learn how to improve outcomes for individuals experiencing shame.Six bibliographical databases were searched for studies measuring internalised shame pre- and post-treatment. We screened 6846 abstracts; 42 full-text manuscripts were retrieved, with 16 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 studies examined between- and within-subject effects, and 6 studies exclusively examined within-subject effects.Twelve of the sixteen included studies reported small to moderate within-group reductions in internalised shame. Between group analyses showed that shame interventions may be more effective than no treatment or treatment as usual, but not more effective than an active comparator.Successful treatments often involved psychoeducation, experiential exercises, and techniques to increase social support and emotional expression; however, study quality was weak to moderate and the importance of each of these techniques for reducing internalised shame was not determined.

French adaptation and validation of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale-self-report.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to conduct a cross-cultural validation of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale - Self-Report (PDSS-SR) and to examine psychometric properties of the French-Canadian version. METHODS: A sample of 256 adults were included in the validation study based on data from the baseline interview of a clinical trial on transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy for mixed anxiety disorders. Participants completed the Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS-5), and self-report instruments including the PDSS-SR, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Mobility Inventory for Agoraphobia (MIA), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). The cross-cultural adaptation in French of the PDSS-SR included a rigorous back-translation process, with an expert committee review. Sensitivity to change was also examined with a subgroup of patients (n = 72) enrolled in the trial. RESULTS: The French version of the PDSS-SR demonstrated good psychometric properties. The exploratory factor analysis supported a one factor structure with an eigenvalue > 1 that explained 64.9% of the total variability. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) corroborated a one-factor model with a good model fit. Internal consistency analysis showed a .91 Cronbach's alpha. The convergent validity was adequate with the ADIS-5 clinical severity ratings for panic disorder (r = .56) and agoraphobia (r = .39), as well as for self-report instruments [BAI (r = .63), MIA (accompanied: r = .50; alone: r = .47) and SDS (r = .37)]. With respect to discriminant validity, lower correlations were found with the SPIN (r = .17), PSWQ (r = .11), ISI (r = .19) and PHQ-9 (r = .28). The optimal threshold for probable diagnosis was 9 for the PDSS-SR and 4 for the very brief 2-item version. The French version showed good sensitivity to change. CONCLUSIONS: The French version of the PDSS-SR has psychometric properties consistent with the original version and constitutes a valid brief scale to assess the severity of panic disorder and change in severity over time, both in research and clinical practice.

Which, who and when? Therapeutic processes in group cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety disorders.

The evidence for the effect of therapeutic alliance in group cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders is unclear. Identifying whether the alliance-outcome relationship depends on (1) which components are assessed, (2) who is measuring the alliance and (3) when the alliance is measured will help to clarify the role of the client-therapist relationship in therapy. The present study explored the effects of alliance component (agreement vs. bond), rater perspective (client vs. therapist) and timing (early vs. late therapy) on the alliance-outcome relationship. Individuals with an anxiety disorder enrolled into transdiagnostic group CBT were studied, with n = 78 at early therapy and n = 57 at late therapy. Results showed that greater client-rated agreement significantly predicted improved post-treatment outcomes throughout the course of therapy, while stronger client-rated bond in late therapy predicted reduced treatment gains. In contrast, therapist perceptions of agreement and bond were not associated with post-treatment outcomes at any point in therapy. Client-reported group cohesion also was not associated with additional variance in outcome after accounting for client-rated alliance. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of prioritizing the client's perception of the client-therapist relationship in CBT for anxiety disorders, as well as distinguishing the effects of component, rater and timing in future process-outcome studies.

Can you see what I see? A comparison of client and observer perspectives of the alliance and group cohesion in CBT.

Both therapeutic alliance and group cohesion have been identified as "demonstrably effective" relationship elements in therapy. However, the overwhelming majority of process-outcome research has relied on clients as raters of the therapeutic relationship. A lack of convergence between client, therapist, and observer perspectives has raised questions regarding how best to measure relationships in therapy. Interest in observational measures has grown, as they may offer more objective and reliable measurements of process. This study compared the predictive validity of client and observer ratings of the alliance (Agreement and Bond) and group cohesion in the context of group cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders. Results showed that client and observer ratings of process were not significantly correlated, and regarding the alliance, only client-rated Agreement predicted client-rated treatment gains. In contrast, both client and observer-ratings of group cohesion were found to uniquely contribute to treatment outcomes. If replicated, the findings from the present study suggest that (1) while client ratings of alliance consistently predict client-rated outcomes, the predictive validity of observer measures has yet to be established, and (2) both clients and observers provide meaningful and distinct information about group cohesion in therapy.

Impact of group transdiagnostic cognitive-behavior therapy for anxiety disorders on comorbid diagnoses: Results from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depressive disorders are the most common mental illnesses worldwide, with most individuals meeting criteria for more than one diagnosis. Most cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches target only one disorder at a time, resulting in the need to treat comorbid diagnoses sequentially. Transdiagnostic CBT protocols have been developed that simultaneously treat principal and comorbid disorders. METHOD: The current study reports on a secondary analysis of data from a pragmatic effectiveness randomized trial of group tCBT in comparison to treatment-as-usual (TAU) in primary care. Of the trial sample of 231 patients, 191 had at least one comorbid diagnosis of clinical severity at T0. RESULTS: Overall rates of comorbidity decreased over time (82.0% at T0, 45.0% at T1, 45.7% at T3) and those receiving tCBT showed a significantly lower rate of comorbidity at T1 (33.7%) than TAU (55.7%) and at T3 (tCBT: 27.9%, TAU: 60.2%). Comorbid diagnosis severity ratings reduced to a significantly greater extent in tCBT than in TAU. CONCLUSIONS: tCBT is effective in promoting remission of and reducing the severity of comorbid diagnoses. Implications for the treatment of whole persons as opposed to specific diagnoses is discussed.

Feasibility and acceptability of an enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy programme for parent-child dyads with anxiety disorders: a mixed-methods pilot trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most widely recognised and efficacious psychological therapy for the treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adults. However, suboptimal remission rates indicate room for improvement in treatments, particularly when both children and their parents have anxiety disorders. Bidirectional transmission and maintenance of anxiety within parent-child dyads could be better targeted by CBT, to improve treatment outcomes for children and parents with anxiety disorders. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a concurrent parent-child enhanced CBT intervention that targets the individual's anxiety disorder(s), as well as the bidirectional factors that influence and maintain anxiety in the dyad. METHODS: Feasibility and acceptability of the proposed CBT protocol will be evaluated in an open-label pilot trial of the intervention utilising qualitative and quantitative data collection. Ten parent-child dyad participants (n = 20) with anxiety disorders will be recruited for the proposed intervention. The intervention is based on an empirically supported 10-week CBT programme for anxiety disorders in adults, adapted to be delivered to parent-child dyads concurrently, and to target anxious modelling and overprotective behaviours through joint observational exposures. Intervention feasibility will be explored by pre-post symptom change on a range of clinician- and self-report measures to determine preliminary indications of participants' intervention response and effect size calculations to estimate sample size for a future definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). Additional feasibility measures will include recruitment rates, completion rates, and adherence to programme requirements. To explore participant acceptability of the intervention, qualitative interviews will be conducted with five parent-child dyads who complete the intervention (n = 10), along with five parent-child dyads with anxiety symptoms who express interest in the intervention (n = 10). Acceptability measures will include prospective and retrospective quantitative self-report and qualitative interview data. DISCUSSION: This pilot trial will utilise a mixed-methods design to determine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering an enhanced CBT intervention for the concurrent treatment of parent-child dyads with anxiety disorders. The results of this trial will inform the development and implementation of a future definitive randomised clinical trial to evaluate intervention efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ANZCTR1261900033410 . Prospectively registered: pre-results. Registered 04 March 2019.

Examining moment to moment affective determinants of smoking rate following a quit attempt among homeless daily smokers.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking disproportionately affects homeless individuals, who have a higher smoking prevalence, fewer resources, and increased stressors compared to domiciled smokers. Little is known about how to facilitate smoking cessation among this population although some findings support focusing efforts on affective variables as well as alternate outcomes in order to optimize interventions for this group. METHODS: Participants were homeless adults recruited from a Dallas, TX, shelter (N = 57, 61.4% male, Mage = 48.8 ± 9.0) to participate in tobacco cessation classes using an American Cancer Society-based therapy and support group with nicotine replacement therapy. Moment-to-moment changes in affect [e.g., negative affect (NA), positive affect (PA), and stress] were recorded via Ecological Momentary Assessments to assess whether they were associated with concurrent changes in cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) following a specific quit attempt. Separate generalized linear models (GLM) were evaluated for each predictor to examine the associations between affective variables and CPD in covariate-adjusted analyses. RESULTS: Significant interaction effects of time and affect were found for all variables (NA: p = 0.0011, PA: p = 0.0006, stress: p = 0.0259), whereby the association of affect and CPD were significant in the early part of the week but the effects faded as time progressed. With regard to main effects, only increases in PA during the post-quit week significantly predicted fewer CPD (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.924, SE = 0.027, p = 0.0032). CONCLUSIONS: Homeless smokers may be more likely to decrease their cigarette consumption during periods of greater PA throughout the post-quit week. Relationship between positive affect and reduction in CPD suggest focus on affective variables with homeless smokers may be an effective avenue for change in smoking behaviors, particularly in the days immediately following a quit attempt. Time effects should be further investigated to determine when these interventions might best be implemented.

Group transdiagnostic cognitive-behavior therapy for anxiety disorders: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Transdiagnostic group cognitive-behavioral therapy (tCBT) is a delivery model that could help overcome barriers to large-scale implementation of evidence-based psychotherapy for anxiety disorders. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of combining group tCBT with treatment-as-usual (TAU), compared to TAU, for the treatment of anxiety disorders in community-based mental health care. METHODS: In a multicenter single-blind, two-arm pragmatic superiority randomized trial, we recruited participants aged 18-65 who met DSM-5 criteria for principal diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or agoraphobia. Group tCBT consisted of 12 weekly 2 h sessions. There were no restrictions for TAU. The primary outcome measures were the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and clinician severity rating from the Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-5 (ADIS-5) for the principal anxiety disorder at post-treatment, with intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: A total of 231 participants were randomized to either tCBT + TAU (117) or TAU (114), with outcome data available for, respectively, 95 and 106. Results of the mixed-effects regression models showed superior improvement at post-treatment for participants in tCBT + TAU, compared to TAU, for BAI [p < 0.001; unadjusted post-treatment mean (s.d.): 13.20 (9.13) v. 20.85 (10.96), Cohen's d = 0.76] and ADIS-5 [p < 0.001; 3.27 (2.19) v. 4.93 (2.00), Cohen's d = 0.79]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the addition of group tCBT into usual care can reduce symptom severity in patients with anxiety disorders, and support tCBT dissemination in routine community-based care.

Elements of the therapeutic relationship in CBT for anxiety disorders: A systematic review.

To optimise the effects of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders, research has increasingly focussed on understanding mechanisms of change. Specifically, the therapeutic relationship has been identified as a potential "active ingredient" of therapy. The evidence for the effects of eleven elements of the therapeutic relationship (alliance, collaboration, goal consensus, group cohesion, empathy, positive regard, feedback, emotional expression, outcome expectations, treatment credibility, alliance rupture-repair) on treatment outcomes in CBT for anxiety disorders was systematically reviewed. Fifty unique studies were included, and findings were qualitatively reviewed and summarised. Results revealed consistent and sizeable evidence for the cohesion-outcome and expectation-outcome relationships. There was emerging evidence for the effects of collaboration, empathy, and alliance rupture-repair on outcomes. However, the evidence for goal consensus and credibility on outcomes was limited. Notably, review of the alliance literature revealed substantial inconsistencies across studies. No studies were identified for positive regard, feedback, and emotional expression. Overall, further research is needed to clarify the role of the therapeutic relationship in CBT for anxiety disorders. These findings will contribute to the conceptual integration of therapeutic relationship constructs in cognitive behavioural models, and help to improve treatments and outcomes for individuals.

Investigating cultural differences in the effects of expressive suppression when processing traumatic distressing material.

BACKGROUND: While suppression is associated with detrimental post-traumatic psychological adjustment, research has not considered the effect of culture on this relationship. AIMS: This study investigated cultural differences in the effects of expressive suppression, whilst watching a traumatic film, on subjective distress, psychophysiological responses and intrusive memory. METHOD: Australians of European heritage or East Asian Australian participants (n = 82) were randomly assigned to either a suppression group (instructed to suppress their emotions during the film) or a control group (no instructions regarding emotion management). Electrodermal activity, heart rate and heart rate variability (root mean square of the successive differences; RMSSD) were measured pre-, during and post-film. Participants reported the number of film-related intrusions in the 5 min and 7 days post-viewing. RESULTS: While the European Australian group did not differ significantly on RMSSD, the East Asian suppression group scored significantly higher on RMSSD during the film than the East Asian control group. Second, those in the suppression groups, regardless of cultural background, reported significantly fewer intrusions immediately post-film than controls. Third, we found that for the European Australian group, change in heart rate interacted with group (control versus suppression) when predicting weekly intrusions. However, for the East Asian group change in heart rate did not interact with group when predicting weekly intrusions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings are discussed in the context of current research on culture and emotion regulation and implications for post-traumatic stress disorder.

Intermittent Motivational Interviewing and Transdiagnostic CBT for Anxiety: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Recent meta-analytic findings suggest that Motivational Interviewing (MI) used as an adjunct to Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders improves overall treatment outcomes (Marker & Norton, 2018). However, when used as a prelude to CBT, MI significantly increases the length of treatment and numerous studies note that the effectiveness of pre-treatment MI subsides over time. The current study adapted an already established 12-session transdiagnostic CBT protocol (tCBT, Norton, 2012) to include one hour of MI spread across four sessions of tCBT (sessions 1, 3, 8, and 10) at 15 minutes each, with the option of including additional MI if resistance arose in therapy. Thirty-six treatment seeking adults with principal anxiety disorder diagnosis were randomly assigned to receive intermittent MI and tCBT (iMI + tCBT) or tCBT and psychoeducation. Results indicated that the iMI + tCBT condition significantly outperformed the tCBT condition on several primary outcome variables. While no significant difference was found between the two groups on clinician rated scores of participant principal anxiety disorder, differences were found on a composite index of participants' self-report measures of symptom improvement, and on clinician rated scores of global psychiatric functioning. These effects were not moderated by baseline motivation or baseline ambivalence. The study also found that the iMI + tCBT condition showed significantly greater improvement to comorbid conditions and greater reduction in self-report depressive symptoms. The inclusion of MI did not impact participant drop out. This study provides further support for integrating MI and tCBT and highlights that even small doses of MI can improve treatment outcomes, without increasing length of usual therapy. Limitations and future research options are also discussed.

Anxiety predicts dyadic sleep characteristics in couples experiencing insomnia but not in couples without sleep disorders.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression are commonly comorbid with sleep problems. Despite growing acknowledgement that bedpartners are important determinants of sleep quality, few studies have explored mental health as a risk factor for disrupted sleep of the bedpartner. We examined whether anxiety or depression symptoms predicted an individual's sleep or their bedpartner's sleep, in couples where one partner experienced insomnia and in couples without sleep disorders. METHODS: Fifty-two bed-sharing couples where one individual had insomnia ("Patient"), and 55 non-sleep-disordered couples completed the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Sleep was monitored for seven nights. Actor-Partner Interdependence Models assessed whether anxiety or depression symptoms predicted individual or dyadic sleep (wake transmission). RESULTS: Greater anxiety symptoms predicted increased vulnerability to being woken by their bedpartner, as well as increased frequency of waking their bedpartner up during the night in Patients with insomnia, but not in non-sleep-disordered couples. Neither anxiety nor depression symptoms predicted an individual's or their bedpartner's sleep efficiency in either subsample. However, ISI was positively predicted by own anxiety and depression symptoms for Patients with insomnia and in non-sleep-disordered couples. LIMITATIONS: The non-sleep-disordered subsample experienced only mild symptoms of anxiety and depression, potentially reducing predictive power. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety may help reveal social determinants of sleep in couples experiencing insomnia. These data underscore the importance of considering sleep, the bedpartner, and affective symptoms in mental health and sleep assessments.